
|
Number Six Speaks
The views posted here reflect the views of Number Six and Number Six alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Not A Number Cards & Gifts.
If you disagree, feel free to enlighten me where I've gone astray, but please provide information and facts to back yourself up.
|
|
|
|
March 2, 2010
Use debit for purchases over $21.00!
|
Here's the facts for any of you who wonder how some of the credit card processing business works. Be aware that this is from the perspective of a small business owner, and thus is very biased and limited in how the credit cards and the banking industry works.
For the record I am VERY PISSED OFF at how the banks took BILLIONS of dollars in our tax dollars in order to stay in business, yet they still insist on charging up to 30%+ in interest, and outrageous late and overlimit fees. At one time this would have been called loan-sharking; however since our government decided to make this legal (how much money did that cost the banks?), it technically isn't loan-sharking or usury.
Now on to how the credit cards work - I'm going to put in actual numbers that reflect close what we (and other small merchants we know) pay. This number will of course be smaller for the larger corporations, who can negotiate better rates based on volume.
When processing a Credit/Debit card it breaks down like this:
If it's a debit transaction, where you enter your PIN number, the merchant pays a flat fee for the transaction, typically between 35-50 cents.
If it's a credit transaction, a merchant pays a percentage of the transaction, (for us 1.66%), plus a transaction fee (for us 12 cents). Now that is not all, if the card is a rewards card there is another 2-3% that is charged to the merchant. So for all of you who use your cards to get reward miles/points etc., be aware that the merchant is paying for those, and that the extra costs to the merchant may be reflected in the retail price of the item. I know 2-3% may not sound like much, but consider this, your local restaurant operates on 4-5% margin, so 2-3% can be HUGE to a merchant.
Also be aware that your local merchant may pay a monthly minimum and other miscellaneous fees such as fees for paper reports.
Using our current processor (with the numbers above), we've calculated that for us, it is less expensive to process transactions less than $21.00 as credit, and above $21.00 as debit. However, since our average sale is only around $14.00, we simply process everything as credit.
As you can see from the above, the banks want you to use your plastic as a credit card not a debit card, and the larger the transaction, the more they want this. I urge all of you to be aware of this, and if the merchant offers it, process your larger transactions as a debit NOT a credit.
Your debit/credit is a way for the banks to get a cut of every transaction, please use your plastic sparingly, let the banks know that their predatory practices are not appreciated and will not be tolerated. Of course the best way to show this would be to use cash and checks (of course they will get a cut of this too, as many banks now charge extra for cash deposits above a certain amount in a month).
Thanks for supporting your local merchant! Buy things you don't need with money you don't have, support the local economy.
|
April 12, 2009
Happy Easter
|
First off, Happy Easter to all of you! Second, any of you who've visited our site will notice that it has FINALLY been redone! Hope you like what you see. Let us know what we can add/change to make it better. What can we add/change to entice you, the reader, to come in our store more often, and/or buy more online ? Yes, we know we have to add more products, beyond that is there anything we should do? We're working on adding more products. As any of you who've been in our store know, we have a LOT of items from lots of different categories. What should we add first? Your input is welcomed. Thanks for visiting.
|
March 19, 2009
The Dr. Demento Theme song in Latin
|
When I was younger (okay much younger), we translated the Dr. Demento theme song into latin:
Medicus abest
Medicus abest
Hoc mox erit cum dementiore (sp) musica
or
The doctor is out
The doctor is out
He'll be right back with more demented music.
|
February 21, 2009
WE NEED YOUR HELP!!!
|
In these tough economic times, we (and all businesses, big and small), need your help. If you like a business, help it out by shopping at it as much as possible. We know times are tough for you also, but if you don't support your favorite businesses, they won't be around when things turn around. Every little bit helps! If enough of you support a business, even a little bit, it will help that business survive.
We thank you all for your past support, and hope that you want us to stick around. We look forward to seeing you, and serving the needs of our local community.
Remember in tough times, we all need a laugh, so come on in for a laugh - buy a little something to give someone else a laugh, and help us survive.
|
September 1, 2008
A New tune for '08
|
Just been too busy to write much. Had the following as a new set of song lyrics for Democrats. Sung to the tune of "Hey Joe"
Hey Joe where you going with that vote in your hand? Going down to smite a young govenor, you know I caught her messing around with John Mcain.
If for some idiotic reason, we elect Mcain, let's hope he survives, as she would be worse than he is!
|
January 28, 2008
Posted this a long time ago in the wrong place
|
Just a few quick notes on the just past election in Washington (last November). I was
very disappointed to see Joe Szwaja lose his bid for Seattle City
Council. He was a highly qualified candidate, who has been a three term
city council member in Madison. He lost in large part due to a very
effective smear campaign around an incident that happened over 17 years
ago. I hope that Joe will run again.
Congratulations
to Tim Burgess, who we supported for this election. We intend to hold
him to his word around gay and gender equality rights!
Very glad
to see that R-67 passed. The insurance companies spent over ten million
to try and defeat it. If they had been acting ethically to begin with,
they would have not had to worry about this bill. As for the claims
about frivilous law suits brought by the trial attorneys, the data I've
seen indicates that this is a very SMALL percentage of lawsuits that
are actually being prosecuted. So a word to insurance companies, PAY
THE JUSTIFIED CLAIMS THAT ARE SUBMITTED TO YOU!
Not sure how
to think about the loss of Proposition 1. This bill was a mess, and as
such deserved defeat. But we do need to do something to address our
transportation issues. I do hope this bill will come back as several
more understandable chunks. |
January 28, 2008
Interesting election polling site
|
Just came across this very interesting site which measures the popularity of candidates by the links that areplaced for different candidates. If you check the site out, you can seethat somehow Ron Paul has a huge lead among the Republicans. I thinkthis just shows how internet savvy the Ron Paul supporters are.
If Dennis Kucinich was still in the race, he'd have gotten my vote. Out of the current Democrats, I currently like Edwards.
I do have to say that I think that campaigning in this country SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED until 3 months before the election! It should be publicly financed - you get x million dollars, and THAT'S IT, NOTHING MORE! Each candidate should be given a certain amount of free TV prime time, andthe networks should be forced to carry their messages. The current campaign has dragged on for FAR too long! Senators Clinton and Obamashould get back to Washington and do the jobs they were elected for! Same goes for Huckabee and Romney - back to work! |
November 2, 2007
Waterboarding
|
As far as I can tell the technique of waterboarding is CLEARLY unconstitutional. Here's the Eight admendment:
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor
cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
Here's the definition of cruel from dictionary.com:
| 1. | willfully or knowingly causing pain or distress to others. |
| 2. | enjoying the pain or distress of others: the cruel spectators of the gladiatorial contests. |
| 3. | causing or marked by great pain or distress: a cruel remark; a cruel affliction. |
| 4. | rigid; stern; strict; unrelentingly severe. |
and here's the definition of unusual:
not usual, common, or ordinary; uncommon in amount or degree; exceptional: an unusual sound; an unusual hobby; an unusual response
Now since I know that words can get contorted when the law is applied I have looked for legal definition which I found at
The legal dictionary
n. governmental penalties against convicted criminal defendants which
are barbaric, involve torture and/or shock the public morality. They
are specifically prohibited under the Eighth Amendment to the U. S.
Constitution. However, nowhere are they specifically defined. Tortures
like the rack (stretching the body inch by inch) or the thumbscrew,
dismemberment, breaking bones, maiming, actions involving deep or
long-lasting pain are all banned. But solitary confinement, enforced
silence, necessary force to prevent injury to fellow prisoners or
guards, psychological humiliation, and bad food are generally allowed.
In short, there is a large gray area, in which "cruel and unusual" is
definitely subjective based on individual sensitivities and moral
outlook. The U. S. Supreme Court waffled on the death penalty,
declaring that some forms of the penalty were cruel and prohibited
under the Furman case (1972), which halted executions for several
years, but later relaxed the prohibition. The question remains if the
gas chamber, hanging, or electrocution are cruel and unusual. Cruel,
certainly, but hanging was not unusual at the time the Bill of Rights
was adopted
Unusual for some odd reason is not in the legal dictionary.
As one can see the legal definition is contorted to hinge on the definition of torture, which interestly is also not in the legal dictionary. So let's apply some common sense (which seems to be missing from some people, and it seems to the judiciary which has allowed this legal "gray area" to exist) and use the dictionary definitions.
If we apply the dictionary definitions then waterboarding is certainly cruel as per definition number one. As to being unusual then we could see that in the US, which has a population of 300 million or so, and there's at most (Let's hope there's a lot less, I'm using an extreme figure to illustrate the point) 10,000 people who the they might decide to use this technique on. So you're odds of being Waterboarded in the US are 10,000 in 300,000,000 or 1 in 30,000. Which seems like it would make it very unusual.
Therefore, Waterboarding is CLEARLY unconstitutional, and the judicuary should stand up and say so! And anybody who is going to be the Attorney General should state this quite clearly or they do not deserve the position.
|
|
Archives |
|
|

|

|
Ads
|
|